"In het verleden behaalde resultaten bieden geen garanties voor de toekomst"
About this blog

These are the ramblings of Matthijs Kooijman, concerning the software he hacks on, hobbies he has and occasionally his personal life.

Most content on this site is licensed under the WTFPL, version 2 (details).

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Powered by Blosxom &Perl onion
(With plugins: config, extensionless, hide, tagging, Markdown, macros, breadcrumbs, calendar, directorybrowse, entries_index, feedback, flavourdir, include, interpolate_fancy, listplugins, menu, pagetype, preview, seemore, storynum, storytitle, writeback_recent, moreentries)
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict & CSS
Replaced GPG key

For anyone that cares: I just replaced my GPG (Gnu Privacy Guard) key that I use for signing my emails and Debian uploads.

My previous key was already 9 years old and used a 1024-bit DSA key. That seemed like a good idea at the time, but for some time these small keys and signatures using SHA-1 have been considered weak and their use is discouraged. By the end of this year, Debian will be actively removing the weak keys from their keyring, so about time I got a stronger key as well (not sure why I didn't act on this before, perhaps it got lost on a TODO list somewhere).

In any case, my new key has ID A1565658 and fingerprint E7D0 C6A7 5BEE 6D84 D638 F60A 3798 AF15 A156 5658. It can be downloaded from the keyservers, or from my own webserver (the latter includes my old key for transitioning).

Now, I should find some Debian Developers to meet in person and sign my key. Should have taken care of this before T-Dose last year...

0 comments -:- permalink -:- 14:03
Automatically restarting my serial console on Arduino uploads

Minicom running under arduinoconsole script Arduino Community Logo

When working with an Arduino, you often want the serial console to stay open, for debugging. However, while you have the serial console open, uploading will not work (because the upload relies on the DTR pin going from high to low, which happens when opening up the serial port, but not if it's already open). The official IDE includes a serial console, which automatically closes when you start an upload (and once this pullrequest is merged, automatically reopens it again).

However, of course I'm not using the GUI serial console in the IDE, but minicom, a text-only serial console I can run inside my screen. Since the IDE (which I do use for compiling uploading, by calling it on the commandline using a Makefile - I still use vim for editing) does not know about my running minicom, uploading breaks.

I fixed this using some clever shell scripting and signal-passing. I have an arduinoconsole script (that you can pass the port number to open - pass 0 for /dev/ttyACM0) that opens up the serial console, and when the console terminates, it is restarted when you press enter, or a proper signal is received.

The other side of this is the Makefile I'm using, which kills the serial console before uploading and sends the restart signal after uploading. This means that usually the serial console is already open again before I switch to it (or, I can switch to it while still uploading and I'll know uploading is done because my serial console opens again).

For convenience, I pushed my scripts to a github repository, which makes it easy to keep them up-to-date too:

0 comments -:- permalink -:- 10:01
Bouncing packets: Kernel bridge bug or corner case?


While setting up Tika, I stumbled upon a fairly unlikely corner case in the Linux kernel networking code, that prevented some of my packets from being delivered at the right place. After quite some digging through debug logs and kernel source code, I found the cause of this problem in the way the bridge module handles netfilter and iptables.

Just in case someone else actually finds himself in this situation and actually manages to find this blogpost, I'll detail my setup, the problem and it solution here.

Tika's network setup

Tika runs Debian wheezy, with a single network interface to the internet (which is not involved in this problem). Furthermore, Tika runs a number of lxc containers, which are isolated systems sharing the same kernel, but running a complete userspace of their own. Using kernel namespaces and cgroups, these containers obtain a fair degree of separation: Each of them has its own root filesystem, a private set of mounted filesystem, separate user ids, separated network stacks, etc.

Each of these containers then connects to the outside world using a virtual ethernet device. This is sort of a named pipe, but then for ethernet. Each veth device has two ends, one inside the container, and one outside, which are connected. On the inside, it just looks like each container has a single ethernet device, which is configured normally. On the outside, all of these veth interfaces are grouped together into a bridge device, br-lxc, which allows the containers to talk amongst themselves (just as if they were connected to the same ethernet switch). The bridge device in the host is configured with an IP address as well, to allow communciation between the host and containers.

Now, I have a few port forwarding rules: when traffic comes in on my public IP address on specific ports, it gets forwarded to a specific container. There is nothing special about this, this is just like forwarding ports to LAN hosts on a NAT router.

A problem with port forwarding like this is that by default, packets coming in from the internal side cannot be properly handled. As an example, one of the containers is running a webserver, which serves a custom Debian repository on the domain. When another container tries to connect to that, DNS resolution will give it the external IP of tika, but connecting to that IP fails.

Usually, the DNAT rule used for portforwarding is configured to only process packets from the external network. But even if it would process internal packets, it would not work. The DNAT rule changes the destination address of these packets to point to my web container so they get sent to the web container. However, the source address is unchanged. Since the containers have a direct connection (through the network bridge) reply packets get sent directly through the original container - the host does not have a chance to "undo" the DNAT on the reply packets. For external connections, this is not a problem because the host is the default gateway for the containers and the replies need to through the host to reach the external ip.

The most common solution to this is split-horizon DNS - make sure that all these domains resolve to the internal address of the web container, so no port forwarding is needed. For various practical reasons, this didn't work for me, so I settled for the other solution: Apply SNAT in addition to DNAT, which causes the source address of the forwarded packets to be changed to the host's address, forcing replies to pass through the host. The Vuurmuur firewall I was using even had a special "bounce" rule for exactly this purpose (setting up a DNAT and SNAT iptables rule).

This setup worked perfectly - when connecting to the web container from other containers. However, when the web container tried to connect to itself (through the public IP address), the packets got lost. I initially thought the packets were droppped - they went through the PREROUTING chain as normal, but never showed up in the FORWARD chain. I also thought the problem was caused by the packet having the same source and destination addresses, since packets coming from other containers worked as normal. Neither of these turned out to be true, as I'll show below.

Simplifying the setup

Since reproducing the problem on a different and/or simpler setup is always a good approach in debugging, I tried to reproduce the problem on my laptop, using a (single) reguler ethernet device and applying DNAT and SNAT rules. This worked as expected, but when I added a bridge interface, containing just the ethernet interface, it broke again. Adding a second (vlan) interface to the bridge uncovered that the problem was not traffic DNATed back to its source, but rather traffic DNATed back to the same bridge port it originated from - traffic from one bridge port DNATed to the other worked normally.

Digging down into the kernel sources for the bridge module, I uncovered this piece of code, which applies some special handling for exactly DNATed packages on a bridge. It seems this is either a performance optimization, or a way to allow DNATing packets inside a bridge without having to enable full routing, though I find the exact effects of this code rather confusing.

I also found that setting the bridge device to promiscuous mode (e.g. running tcpdump) makes everything work. Setting /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables to 0 also makes this work. This setting is to prevent bridged packets from passing through iptables, but since this packet wasn't actually a bridged packet before PREROUTING, this actually makes the packet be processed using the normal routing code and progresses through all regular chains normally.

Here's what I think happens:

  • The packet comes in br_handle_frame
  • The frame gets dumped into the NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING netfilter chain (e.g. the bridge / ebtables version, not the ip / iptables one).
  • The ebtables rules get called
  • The br_nf_pre_routing hook for NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING gets called. This interrupts (returns NF_STOLEN) the handling of the NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING chain, and calls the NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING chain.
  • The br_nf_pre_routing_finish finish handler gets called after completing the NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING chain.
  • This handler resumes the handling of the interrupted NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING chain. However, because it detects that DNAT has happened, it sets the finish handler to br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge instead of the regular br_handle_frame_finish finish handler.
  • br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge runs, this skb->dev to the parent bridge and sets the BRNF_BRIDGED_DNAT flag which calls neigh->output(neigh, skb); which presumably resolves to one of the neigh_*output functions, each of which again calls dev_queue_xmit, which should (eventually) call br_dev_xmit.
  • br_dev_xmit sees the BRNF_BRIDGED_DNAT flag and calls br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow instead of actually delivering the packet.
  • br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow sets up the destination MAC address, sets skb->dev back to skb->physindev and calls br_handle_frame_finish.
  • br_handle_frame_finish calls br_forward. If the bridge device is set to promisicuous mode, this also delivers the packet up through br_pass_frame_up. Since enabling promiscuous mode fixes my problem, it seems likely that the packet manages to get all the way to here.
  • br_forward calls should_deliver, which returns false when skb->dev != p->dev (and "hairpin mode" is not enabled) causing the packet to be dropped.

This seems like a bug, or at least an unfortunate side effect. It seems there's currently two ways two work around this problem:

  • Setting /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables to 0, so there is no need for this DNAT + bridge stuff. The side effect of this solution is that bridge packets don't go through iptables, but that's really what I'd have expected in the first place, so this is not a problem for me.
  • Setting the bridge port to "hairpin" mode, which allows sending ports back into it. The side effect here is, AFAICS, that broadcast packets are sent back into the bridge port as well, which isn't really needed (but shouldn't really hurt either).

Next up is reporting this to a kernel mailing list to confirm if there is an actual kernel bug, or just a bug in my expectations :-)

Update: Turns out this behaviour was previously spotted, but no concensus about a fix was reached.

Related stories
0 comments -:- permalink -:- 18:40
Introducing Tika

Tika Tovenaar Supermicro 5015A

(This post has been lying around as a draft for a few years, thought I'd finish it up and publish it now that Tika has finally been put into production)

A few months years back, I purchased a new server together with some friends, which we've named "Tika" (daughter of "Tita Tovenaar", both wizards from a Dutch television series from the 70's). This name combine's Daenney's "wizards and magicians" naming scheme with my "Television shows from my youth" naming schemes quite neatly. :-)

It's a Supermicro 5015A rack server sporting an Atom D510 dual core processor, 4GB ram, 500GB of HD storage and recently added 128G of SSD storage. It is intended to replace Drsnuggles, my current HP DL360G2 (which has been very robust and loyal so far, but just draws too much power) as well as Daenney's Zeratul, an Apple Xserve. Both of our current machines draw around 180W, versus just around 20-30W for Tika. :-D You've got to love the Atom processor (and it probably outperforms our current hardware anyway, just by being over 5 years newer...).

Over the past three years, I've been working together with Daenney and Bas on setting up the software stack on Tika, which proved a bit more work than expected. We wanted to have a lot of cool things, like LXC containers, privilege separation for webapplications, a custom LDAP schema and a custom web frontend for user (self-)management, etc. Me being the perfectionist I am, it took quite some effort to get things done, also producing quite a number of bug reports, patches and custom scripts in the process.

Last week, we've finally put Tika into production. My previous server, drsnuggles had a hardware breakdown, which forced me wrap up Tika's configuration into something usable (which still took me a week, since I seem to be unable to compromise on perfection...). So now my e-mail, websites and IRC are working as expected on Tika, with the stuff from Bas and Daenney still needing to be migrated.

I also still have some draft postings lying around about Maroesja, the custom LDAP schema / user management setup we are using. I'll try to wrap those up in case others are interested. The user management frontend we envisioned hasn't been written yet, but we'll soon tire of manual LDAP modification and get to that, I expect :-)

0 comments -:- permalink -:- 14:10
JTAG and SPI headers for the Pinoccio Scout

Pinoccio Scout

The Pinoccio Scout is a wonderful Arduino-like microcontroller board that has builtin mesh networking, a small form factor and a ton of resources (at least in Arduino terms: 32K of SRAM and 256K of flash).

However, flashing a new program into the scout happens through a serial port at 115200 baud. That's perfectly fine when you only have 32K of flash or for occasional uploads. But when you upload a 100k+ program dozens of times per day, it turns out that that's actually really slow! Uploading and verifying a 104KiB sketch takes over 30 seconds, just too long to actually wait for it (so you do something else, get distracted, and gone is the productivity).

$ time avrdude -p atmega256rfr2  -cwiring -P/dev/ttyACM0 -b115200 -D -Uflash:w:Bootstrap.cpp.hex:i

avrdude: AVR device initialized and ready to accept instructions

Reading | ################################################## | 100% 0.01s

avrdude: Device signature = 0x1ea802
avrdude: reading input file "Bootstrap.cpp.hex"
avrdude: writing flash (106654 bytes):

Writing | ################################################## | 100% 18.80s

avrdude: 106654 bytes of flash written
avrdude: verifying flash memory against Bootstrap.cpp.hex:
avrdude: load data flash data from input file Bootstrap.cpp.hex:
avrdude: input file Bootstrap.cpp.hex contains 106654 bytes
avrdude: reading on-chip flash data:

Reading | ################################################## | 100% 13.51s

avrdude: verifying ...
avrdude: 106654 bytes of flash verified

avrdude: safemode: Fuses OK (H:DE, E:10, L:DE)

avrdude done.  Thank you.

real    0m32.824s
user    0m0.120s
sys     0m0.560s

Using an external (ISP) programmer is supposed to be faster. I had an STK500 development board to use, but that's also connected to my PC through a 115200 baud serial port, so no help there.

$ time avrdude -patmega256rfr2 -cstk500v2 -P/dev/serial/stk500 -b115200 -D -Uflash:w:Bootstrap.cpp.hex:i
real    0m27.523s

So, I got myself a JTAGICE3 programmer, which as an added bonus can do in-circuit debugging as well (e.g. stepping through the code, dumping variables). After setting up the udev permission rules on my Linux system, I used a bunch of jumper wires to hook the JTAG3ICE to the ISP/SPI pins of my Scout.

JTAG3ICE connected to Scout with jumper wires


SPI pinFunctionPinoccio pin
2VTARGETSCL (through diode)

One pin was particularly cumbersome: the VTARGET pin. On my STK500 board, this pin supplies a configurable voltage, to power the target board. However, on the Scout, there is no direct access to the VCC line on the pin headers (the 3V3 pin is the output from a secondary regulator, not connected to the main MCU's VCC and it cannot be used as a power input).

I tried powering the board through the USB cable as normal and leaving VTARGET pin on my JTAG3ICE disconnected, but that didn't work. Interestingly enough, using the 6-pin ISP "connector" (no pins, only pads) on the bottom of my scout did work right away.

It turns out the JTAGICE3 doesn't actually provide power on the VTARGET pin. Instead, it uses the pin to sample the target's voltage, so it can drive its data pins at the same voltage as the target, without needing to explicitly configure the voltage. This posed me with a challenge: I needed to put 3.3V on the VTARGET pin, but the 3V3 pin needs to be explicitely enabled by the Scout (and gets turned off when the AVR MCU is held in reset during ISP programming).

Fortunately, the SDA, SCL and BKP (backpack bus) pins contain a pull-up resistor. When nothing else is connected to this pins, their voltage is approximately VCC. Connecting VTARGET to one of these made things work!

Update: It seems that connecting VTARGET to BKP doesn't work, since its pullup resistor is big (100kΩ) and the VTARGET pin draws about 15 μA, resulting in a 1.5V voltage drop.

Connecting VTARGET to SDA or SCL prevents I²C from working properly when the JTAGICE3 is still connected, it seems like the JTAGICE3 acts like a capacitor, keeping the pins high and messing up the signals. Adding a 10k resistor helps to fix the I²C, but breaks JTAG programming again for reasons I don't full grasp. However, adding a diode (I used an 1N4148) between SCL and VTARGET (connected such that current can flow from SCL to VTARGET but not the other way around) fixes everything. This does mean the actual programming happens at 2.8V due to the diode voltage drop, but that's still more than enough.

$ time avrdude -patmega256rfr2 -cjtag3isp -B1 -D -Uflash:w:Bootstrap.cpp.hex:i
real    0m17.280s

Note the -B1 option, which selects the fastest SPI speed supported by the JTAGICE3 (You can also just pass a lower number, which should also use the fastest supported speed, according to the avrdude sources).

This is already a bit better, but still not as good as I'd want.

Using JTAG

JTAG pinFunctionPinoccio pin
4VTGSCL (through diode)

Until now, we used ISP which talks to the target chip over the SPI pins (MISO/MOSI/SCK) and is limited to 1Mhz operation on the JTAGICE3. However, you can also program this AVR chip using JTAG, a protocol originally designed for debugging. Using JTAG, the JTAGICE3 can run up to 10Mhz according to avrdude. This isn't 10x as fast as ISP (probably because JTAG has more protocol overhead), but the speedup is significant.

Before we can do JTAG, though, we'll have to enable (switch to 0) the JTAGEN fuse in the atmega256rfr2. We can do this using the JTAG3ICE's SPI mode:

$ avrdude -p atmega256rfr2 -c jtag3isp -U hfuse:w:0x10:m

Note that this fuse setting is specific to the Pinoccio Scout / Atmega256rfr2. If you have another device, check the datasheet for the correct fuse settings. Furthermore, this fuse setting also programs the OCDEN (on-chip debugging) fuse, though I haven't actually tried to use it. Keep in mind that with the JTAGEN fuse enabled, you can't use the JTAG pins for other purposes. Also, enabling the JTAGEN and OCDEN fuses increases power usage.

After enabling the fuse, I can flash sketches through the JTAG pins (which are mapped to A4-A7 on the Scout):

$ time avrdude -patmega256rfr2 -cjtag3 -B0.1 -D -Uflash:w:Bootstrap.cpp.hex:i
real    0m6.715s

Yeah, now we're talking!

Note again the -B option, for which 0.1 seems the fastest value for JTAG (though these values are a bit finniky, it seems that the JTAGICE3 firmware does some manipulation with this value).

Proper headers

However, having to plug in 6 or 7 jumper wires whenever I want to flash a different board is a bit cumbersome (especially having to remember which wire goes where). Having proper headers (6-pin ISP header and a 10-pin JTAG header) would help here. This is where the Pinoccio Protoboard comes in: it's essentially a DIY backpack that you can solder components - or connectors - onto. After figuring out the pinout puzzle (so many crossed wires, good that these boards have two sides!) I ended up with this piece of work:

JTAG3ICE connected to Scout through custom backpack Backpack top Backpack bottom

I marked pin 1 with a small black dot, which is commonly done with these kinds of connectors.

Next up: figuring out the debugging support using avrice on Linux, or if that doesn't work, Atmel Studio on Windows...

Update: The SVN version from avarice supports the JTAGICE3, so I can single-step through my code using gdb :-D

Update: I've been working on a proper PCB design for this board (since I needed one or two more). I haven't actually built one yet, but the design so far is available on github. See below for the rendered schematic and board files.

JTAG Backpack schematic JTAG Backpack board

Peter wrote at 2014-09-11 02:54

Hi Matthijis

Thanks for this useful piece. "Also, enabling the JTAGEN and OCDEN fuses increases power usage." Can I disable the fuse after I prototype with it to lower power usage?

Matthijs Kooijman wrote at 2014-09-11 07:35

Yes, if you disable the fuse again, the power usage will drop back to normal (and of course you can no longer access the chip through JTAG anymore).

Peter Northling wrote at 2014-09-16 02:35

Hey Matthijs

Do you think you can release a simplified schematics for the protoboard connections?

Matthijs Kooijman wrote at 2014-09-16 10:29

Incidentally, I was already working on a proper PCB design for this, so I had a schematic lying around already (planning to publish things once I got the first working PCB milled). But, now that you asked, I cleaned up the schematic a bit and published stuff right away, see the update in the post above.

Thanks for your interest! Let me know if you build one yourself!



4 comments -:- permalink -:- 18:01
Using a JTAGICE3 programmer under Linux: Setting up permissions


Last week, I got a fancy new JTAGICE3 programmer / debugger. I wanted to achieve two things in my Pinoccio work: Faster uploading of programs (Having 256k of flash space is nice, but flashing so much code through a 115200 baud serial connection is slow...) and doing in-circuit debugging (stepping through code and dumping variables should turn out easier than adding serial prints and re-uploading every time).

In any case, the JTAGICE3 device is well-supported by avrdude, the opensource uploader for AVR boards. However, unlike devices like the STK500 development board, the AVR dragon programmer/debugger and the Arduino bootloader, which use an (emulated) serial port to communicate, the JTAGICE3 uses a native USB protocol. The upside is that the data transfer rate is higher, but the downside is that the kernel doesn't know how to talk to the device, so it doesn't expose something like /dev/ttyUSB0 as for the other devices.

avrdude solves this by using libusb, which can talk to USB devices directly, through files in /dev/usb/. However, by default these device files are writable only by root, since the kernel has no idea what kind of devices they are and whom to give permissions.

To solve this, we'll have to configure the udev daemon to create the files in /dev/usb with the right permissions. I created a file called /etc/udev/rules.d/99-local-jtagice3.rules, containg just this line:

SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="03eb", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2110", GROUP="dialout"

This matches the JTAGICE3 specifically using it's USB vidpid (03eb:2110, use lsusb to find the id of a given device) and changes the group for the device file to dialout (which is also used for serial devices on Debian Linux), but you might want to use another group (don't forget to add your own user to that group and log in again, in any case).

0 comments -:- permalink -:- 13:57
Current measurement helper board

Recently, I needed to do battery current draw measurements on my Pinoccio boards. Since the battery is connected using this tinywiny JST connector, I couldn't just use some jumper wires to redirect the current flow through my multimeter. I ended up using jumper wires, combined with my Bus Pirate fanout cable, which has female connectors just small enough, to wire everything up. The result was a bit of a mess:

Messy setup

Admittedly, once I cleaned up all the other stuff around it from my desk for this picture, it was less messy than I thought, but still, jamming in jumper wires into battery connectors like this is bound to wear them out.

So, I ordered up some JST FSH connectors (as used by the battery) and some banana sockets and built a simple board that allows connecting a power source and a load, keeping the ground pins permanently connected, but feeding the positive pins through a pair of banana sockets where a current meter can plug in. For extra flexibility, I added a few other connections, like 2.54mm header pins and sockets, a barrel jack plug and more banana sockets for the power source and load. I just realized I should also add USB connectors, so I can easily measure current used by an USB device.

The board also features a switch (after digging in my stash, I found one old three-way switch, which is probably the first component to die in this setup. The switch allows switching between "on", "off" and "redirect through measurement pins" modes. I tried visualizing the behaviour of the pins on the top of the PCB, but I'm not too happy with the result. Oh well, as long as I know what does :-)

Improved setup Top Bottom

All I need is a pretty case to put under the PCB and a μCurrent to measure small currents accurately and I'm all set!

0 comments -:- permalink -:- 18:27
Updating the Xprotolab portable firmware on Linux

Xprotolab Portable

I recently got myself an Xprotolab Portable, which is essentially a tiny, portable 1Msps scope (in hindsight I might have better gotten the XMinilab Portable which is essentially the same, but slightly bigger, more expensive and with a bigger display. Given the size of the cables and carrying case, the extra size of the device itself is negligable, while the extra screen size is significant).

In any case, I wanted to update the firmware of the device, but the instructions refer only to a Windows-only GUI utility from Atmel, called "FLIP". I remembered seeing a flip.c file inside the avrdude sources though, so I hoped I could also flash this device using avrdude on Linux. And it worked! Turns out it's fairly simple.

  1. Activate the device's bootloader, by powering off, then press K1 and keep it pressed while turning the device back on with the menu key. The red led should light up, the screen will stay blank.
  2. Get the appropriate firmware hex files from the Xprotolab Portable page. You can find them at the "Hex" link in the top row of icons.
  3. Run avrdude, for both the application and EEPROM contents:

    sudo avrdude -c flip2 -p x32a4u -U application:w:xprotolab-p.hex:i
    sudo avrdude -c flip2 -p x32a4u -U eep:w:xprotolab-p.eep:i

    I'm running under sudo, since this needs raw USB access to the USB device. Alternatively, you can set up udev to offer access to your regular user (like I did for the JTAGICE3), but that's probably too much effort just for a one-off firmware update.

  4. Done!

Note that you have to use avrdude version 6.1 or above, older versions don't support the FLIP protocol.

0 comments -:- permalink -:- 10:22
Dynamic memory allocation debugging

Arduino Community Logo

While trying to track down a reset bug in the Pinoccio firmware, I suspected something was going wrong in the dynamic memory management (e.g., double free, or buffer overflow). For this, I wrote some code to log all malloc, realloc and free calls, as wel as a python script to analyze the output.

This didn't catch my bug, but perhaps it will be useful to someone else.

In addition to all function calls, it also logs the free memory after the call and shows the return address (e.g. where the malloc is called from) to help debugging.

It uses the linker's --wrap, which allows replacing arbitrary functions with wrappers at link time. To use it with Arduino, you'll have to modify platform.txt to change the linker options (I hope to improve this on the Arduino side at some point, but right now this seems to be the only way to do this).

0 comments -:- permalink -:- 21:47
Twente Mini Maker Faire

Twente Mini Maker Faire Logo

I just returned from the Twente Mini Maker Fair in Hengelo, where I saw a lot of cool makers and things. Eye-catchers were the "strandbeest" from Theo Janssen, a big walking contraption, powered by wind, made from PVC tubing, a host of different hackerspaces and fablabs, all kinds of cool technology projects for kids from the Technlogy Museum Heim and all kinds of cool buttonsy projects from the enthousiastic Herman Kopinga. All this in a cool industrial atmosphere of an old electrical devices factory.

Also nice to meet some old and new familiar people. I ran into Leo Simons, with whom I played theatre sports at Pro Deo years ago. He was now working with his father and brother on the Portobello, a liquid resin based 3D printer, which looked quite promising. I also ran into Edwin Dertien (also familiar from Pro Deo as well as the Gonnagles), whom seemed to be on the organising side of some lectures during the faire. I attended one lecture by Harmen Zijp and Diana Wildschut (which form the Amersfoort-based art group "de Spullenmannen") about the overlap and interaction between art and science, which was nice. I also ran into Govert Combée, a LARPer I knew from Enschede.

Strandbeest by Theo Jansen

Overall, this was a nice place to visit. Lots of cool stuff to see and play with, lots of interesting people. There was also a nice balance of technology vs art, and electronics vs "regular" projects: Nice to see that the Maker mindset appeals to all kinds of different people!

0 comments -:- permalink -:- 13:11
Showing 1 - 10 of 147 posts
Copyright by Matthijs Kooijman